NO1. 下面是審稿人對某篇APL文章的評論 RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor) Paper Interesting: Yes Original Paper: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized and Clear: Yes Free From Errors: No Conclusions Supported: Yes Appropriate Title: No Good Abstract: Yes Satisfactory English: No Adequate References: Yes Clear Figures: No OVERALL RATING: Fair
NO.2 下面是審稿人對某篇JAP文章的評論 JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS： Reviewer Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Major Revision Paper Interesting: No Good Use of Space: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized: Yes Clearly Written: No Spelling: Yes Good Title: No Good Abstract: Yes Adequate References: No Clear Figures: Yes TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal PRESENTATION RATING: Marginal
NO.3 下面是Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters期刊編輯 要求審稿人審稿時要考慮的幾個要點： Quality and significance of the Article Clarity of Presentation Suitability for Letters Clarity of Figures and Tables (Is color essential?) Understandable to Non-Specialists? Does Material Need to Be Added or Deleted? Recommendation Do You Want to See the Revised Manuscript?
審稿人對Manuscript的最終審稿結果： Overall Rating: Reconsider based on responses to issues raised by reviewers Good Scientific Quality: Yes Appropriate Journal: Yes Satisfactory English/References: No Tables/Figures Adequate: No Significance Level: 4 Significance Level Comment: The author fabricated a good inductor on Si substrate with high Q-factor. Appropriate Title and Abstract: Yes
